<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Travel Gear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/</link>
	<description>Photos and Thoughts -  DAVE BECKERMAN</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D. Brent Miller</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Brent Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-103</guid>
		<description>I like Lightroom. I liked it from day 1 when Adobe allowed every photographer to download it and use it for free. That was a great marketing decision. I use Lightroom a lot more than Photoshop. In fact, I wonder why I even need Photoshop! I take a minimalist approach: get the correct capture, then you don&#039;t have to spend a lot of time fixing things with every piece of software available under the sun.

For the record, I am shooting with a Canon 1D MkII, an 8 megapixel, very low noise, camera; and a Hasselblad 501CM. I use a scanner to make really big files of those 6X6 negatives!

Brent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Lightroom. I liked it from day 1 when Adobe allowed every photographer to download it and use it for free. That was a great marketing decision. I use Lightroom a lot more than Photoshop. In fact, I wonder why I even need Photoshop! I take a minimalist approach: get the correct capture, then you don&#8217;t have to spend a lot of time fixing things with every piece of software available under the sun.</p>
<p>For the record, I am shooting with a Canon 1D MkII, an 8 megapixel, very low noise, camera; and a Hasselblad 501CM. I use a scanner to make really big files of those 6X6 negatives!</p>
<p>Brent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave beckerman</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>dave beckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Disagree.  But I&#039;ll take it offline.  DB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disagree.  But I&#8217;ll take it offline.  DB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-95</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lightroom has paid for itself many times over&quot;

It&#039;s a useful bolting-together of Bridge and ACR, but I still find it a clunky beast. The one killer feature is the Brush Tool, for nondestructive local correction of brightness, sharpness, contrast, saturation, clarity &amp; color. 

If it weren&#039;t for that I&#039;d run FAST to Aperture, which lets you do anything from wherever you are in the app, without having to be in a &#039;module,&#039; and which has great automation capabilities for quickly applying changes to multiple images. Aperture also has a super plugin architecture, but plugins don&#039;t access the RAW stream so you need to create NON-nondestructive TIFFs for work. And good plugins cost $$$. 
On the other hand, for ultimate RAW correction work I need to also use the almost criminally borked Capture NX, whose RAW tweaking and local corrections are superior to Lightroom&#039;s ... assuming the thing doesn&#039;t lock up and assuming I don&#039;t need to work on more than an image at a time. If Apple or Adobe ever opened up their apps to drop-in 3rd party RAW conversion, I&#039;d probably cry and kiss someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lightroom has paid for itself many times over&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a useful bolting-together of Bridge and ACR, but I still find it a clunky beast. The one killer feature is the Brush Tool, for nondestructive local correction of brightness, sharpness, contrast, saturation, clarity &amp; color. </p>
<p>If it weren&#8217;t for that I&#8217;d run FAST to Aperture, which lets you do anything from wherever you are in the app, without having to be in a &#8216;module,&#8217; and which has great automation capabilities for quickly applying changes to multiple images. Aperture also has a super plugin architecture, but plugins don&#8217;t access the RAW stream so you need to create NON-nondestructive TIFFs for work. And good plugins cost $$$.<br />
On the other hand, for ultimate RAW correction work I need to also use the almost criminally borked Capture NX, whose RAW tweaking and local corrections are superior to Lightroom&#8217;s &#8230; assuming the thing doesn&#8217;t lock up and assuming I don&#8217;t need to work on more than an image at a time. If Apple or Adobe ever opened up their apps to drop-in 3rd party RAW conversion, I&#8217;d probably cry and kiss someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Beckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Brent, and I&#039;m regularly selling prints done with my 20D at 1600 at night at large sizes (or at least as big as my printer goes).  

So I&#039;m starting to think that from a business point-of-view, the camera is not that critical.  Not compared to the printer, the software you use -- for me Lightroom has paid for itself many times over -- and whatever speeds up your workflow.

I&#039;ve sold tons of shots that I did with the 8MP infrared converted LifePixel Rebel.  It doesn&#039;t mean don&#039;t run out and get what you want, camera-wise, but simply that from a financial point of view, I&#039;d put the money into lenses, printers, software etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent, and I&#8217;m regularly selling prints done with my 20D at 1600 at night at large sizes (or at least as big as my printer goes).  </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m starting to think that from a business point-of-view, the camera is not that critical.  Not compared to the printer, the software you use &#8212; for me Lightroom has paid for itself many times over &#8212; and whatever speeds up your workflow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve sold tons of shots that I did with the 8MP infrared converted LifePixel Rebel.  It doesn&#8217;t mean don&#8217;t run out and get what you want, camera-wise, but simply that from a financial point of view, I&#8217;d put the money into lenses, printers, software etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Brent Miller</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Brent Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I also wanted to add a thought about another item you mentioned: Cameras vs. Printers.

I had never thought of this before. Sure the camera captures the image, some better than others. Resolution can make a difference, but there are programs to increase resolution. When I was shooting professional baseball, I had images on billboards, images taken with a 6 megapixel Canon 10D.

The printer, on the other hand, makes the products the customer buys. This is where resolution really counts! And the size of the print, like you said, generates the revenue.

Brent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wanted to add a thought about another item you mentioned: Cameras vs. Printers.</p>
<p>I had never thought of this before. Sure the camera captures the image, some better than others. Resolution can make a difference, but there are programs to increase resolution. When I was shooting professional baseball, I had images on billboards, images taken with a 6 megapixel Canon 10D.</p>
<p>The printer, on the other hand, makes the products the customer buys. This is where resolution really counts! And the size of the print, like you said, generates the revenue.</p>
<p>Brent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Brent Miller</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Brent Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-92</guid>
		<description>I have explored going back to XP Pro, but it would require another re-install of everything. I&#039;ve just been through that once with Vista. I&#039;m just going to hang on with Vista for now. I understand MS has a new operating system in development. I may join the Beta crowd.

There are two options (as I see it) for backup in the field: DVD or external HD. Your Dell has the DVD burner, so just carry blank DVDs with you.

I bought a Western Digital 500G USB external hard drive to back up my work in the field--providing me with two copies of work--one on the computer one on the USB HD. About $100 for 500G of external HD. It&#039;s pretty fast. Faster than burning DVDs.

Brent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have explored going back to XP Pro, but it would require another re-install of everything. I&#8217;ve just been through that once with Vista. I&#8217;m just going to hang on with Vista for now. I understand MS has a new operating system in development. I may join the Beta crowd.</p>
<p>There are two options (as I see it) for backup in the field: DVD or external HD. Your Dell has the DVD burner, so just carry blank DVDs with you.</p>
<p>I bought a Western Digital 500G USB external hard drive to back up my work in the field&#8211;providing me with two copies of work&#8211;one on the computer one on the USB HD. About $100 for 500G of external HD. It&#8217;s pretty fast. Faster than burning DVDs.</p>
<p>Brent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Beckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Yes - this comes with XP Pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; this comes with XP Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig M. Nisnewitz</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig M. Nisnewitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Dell does make good laptops but some of their stuff can cause problems.  On some of them they have proprietary software for setting up the hard disk that make it impossible for future upgrades.  Also,I would go with XP or XP Pro as the operating system.  Vista stinks.  My son has a Compaq with Vista Home and its a memory hog.  2 gigs of ram is not enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell does make good laptops but some of their stuff can cause problems.  On some of them they have proprietary software for setting up the hard disk that make it impossible for future upgrades.  Also,I would go with XP or XP Pro as the operating system.  Vista stinks.  My son has a Compaq with Vista Home and its a memory hog.  2 gigs of ram is not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Hartel</title>
		<link>http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/travel-gear/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Hartel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dbeckerman.wordpress.com/?p=169#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Panther is 2 generations behind... what you really want is Leopard (OS X 10.5)... it runs well on PCs with decent hardware, I even ran it on the crappy Acer One for a while. The Dell may work well, since they use very common hardware... matter of fact, I had to get a wireless Dell card to get it working in the Acer.

Modifying the Leopard install DVD is no piece of cake, but there are other solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panther is 2 generations behind&#8230; what you really want is Leopard (OS X 10.5)&#8230; it runs well on PCs with decent hardware, I even ran it on the crappy Acer One for a while. The Dell may work well, since they use very common hardware&#8230; matter of fact, I had to get a wireless Dell card to get it working in the Acer.</p>
<p>Modifying the Leopard install DVD is no piece of cake, but there are other solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
